Saturday, April 18, 2020

American Heroes

David Geffens $590 million dollar yacht at sunset in the Carribean
Entertainment mogul David Geffen's post from his
$590 million yacht in the Caribbean, where he is "sheltering in place."
I met real American heroes this morning at 7 am at the local Market Basket grocery store--an employee standing in the falling snow warmly greeting and counting patrons as they walked into the store. At the checkout counter both the cashier and bagger were friendly, helpful, chatty for that hour of the morning, smiling warmly. In the midst of this COVID-19 pandemic, these employees, making about $17,000 a year risk exposure every day to pay their rent, feed their kids, and ensure that we can get needed supplies. They probably hold other jobs too because a family of 4 with an annual income of less than $25K lives in poverty today in the U.S.. 12% of U.S. residents currently live in poverty, going into the COVID-19 crisis, so sheltering in place, in their rented apartment is certainly not even an option.

In the last 60 years,  the wealth in the U.S. (GDP) has doubled, and American's productivity has increased by 7 times. Yet, according to economist Joseph Stiglitz, when adjusted for inflation, wages remain, "roughly at the same level they were sixty years ago."  That means that more than twice the money has been earned by businesses in the U.S., as a result of 7 times the productivity of their employees, with no corresponding increases in wages.

During the same time that GDP in the U.S. doubled, the rate of taxes for top wage earners in the U.S. dropped from 70% in 1980 to %25 in 2017.  By the way, in 1960, the tax rate for these top wage earners was 91%, down from a high of 94% in the 1940s! All this means is that a lot more of the money acquired by corporate executives and shareholders has remained in their pockets. The idea, promoted by Milton Friedman and implemented by Ronald Reagan was to provide tax  welfare benefits to those accumulating the most wealth so it would "trickle down" to the rest of us. This tax welfare has instead resulted in huge federal deficits, and an economy poorly positioned to manage a crisis like COVID-19, unlike other countries like South Korea, Bangkok, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong. 

It is sadly ironic that the country with the highest per capita healthcare spending, is to date, one of the countries struggling to provide the very basics during this crisis--personal protective gear, like masks, gloves, and gowns to healthcare workers, and is unable to ramp up widespread testing because of chronic supply shortages. At the same time, countries with much lower per capita healthcare costs in single-payer systems, like Canada, Germany, Taiwan, etc.

So, there have been some huge beneficiaries of the tax welfare the U.S. has provided to corporations and business moguls like David Geffen who tweet to the rest of us from the yachts they purchased with the money they made by not increasing our wages and benefits at a time we increased their productivity by 7 times and doubled their profits, while decreasing their tax burdens by 50%! While corporate executives "shelter in place" on their yachts, it will be left up to the real American heroes, like the ones I saw at the local grocery store this morning, to clean up the mess, and do with much less, while the recipients of this lavish welfare share photos of the spoils they have defrauded hard-working Americans out of.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Trumpland Resources

Trumpland Resources


It's hard to know how we got here, or where to begin to do something constructive about this. I am just going to add random links to this page and a brief commentary on each as I find them.

Indivisible Guide: Start here if you don't know what to do next. The Indivisible Guide is written by people who have been in the business of seeing how stuff gets done in DC. In a nutshell, this is how the Tea Party made progress, like it or not. Do you want to make change? This is how.

Indivisible Guide Audio: This is the audio file from the podcast Best of the Left so you can just download this and listen at your leisure.

US Senate Phone Numbers: 202-225-3121 or 202-224-3121. Call either one and ask for your senator(s) and tell them what you think. Call every day!

What Effective Protest Could Look Like on the Atlantic site by David Frum. Read this with the Indivisible Guide. This might be the most important read for those of us trying to make real change, rather than just venting outrage.

What So Many People Don't Get About the US Working Class by Joan C Williams, Harvard Business Review: How did we get here? What's the message moving forward? How can we listen or hear what's needed to make effective change?

A Clarifying Moment in American History by Eliot C Cohen in Atlantic. Another conservative writer I might not ordinarily read.

Michael Moore at Women’s March. The number to call your Senator is 202-225-3121. Moore's message is practical and actionable, which is what is needed.

A Republican Intellectual Explains Why The Republican Party is Going to Die written over the summer before the election and posted to Vox. Interesting historical perspective.

President Trump: How and Why?  video of Jonathan Pie. Quite a rant here with persistent and frequent use of the "F" word so use caution. Really points a finger squarely at lefty elitists who didn't hear what Trump voters needed or wanted. Worth the shock.

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Ignorance and Want

Ignorance and Want

Ignorance and Want children beneath the robe of the Christmas Present Spirit

Even before watching the 1951 version of "Scrooge" this year, a favorite tradition, I was thinking about the scene in the photo above, where two children are found clinging to the inside of the Spirit of Christmas Present.  The Spirit tells Scrooge, they are Ignorance and Want.

This scene, came to mind after listening to a recent interview Bruce Springsteen gave with David Remick for the New Yorker podcast, Episode 58,  during which Springsteen said the following, about some of the voters in 2016, looking for hope in the presidency of Donald Trump:

Well I think if you look at the history of Youngstown or any of the places you've mentioned, you see that, basically I've written about the last 40 years of of de-industrialization. Globalization hit a lot of people very, very, very hard and their concerns , problems and issues were never addressed by either party, so there's a sea of people out there who are waiting and hoping…It's a con job, but I completely understand why a voice like that would be appealing.

It was refreshing, after all the finger-pointing to hear someone offer an explanation, without pointing fingers, understanding that there really is "a sea of people out there" waiting, hoping, and wanting.

Charles Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol nearly 175 years ago, in large part, as a social commentary, an alternative to the social pampjlet he originally planned to write, highlighting the plight of children and families living in poverty, as the Industrial Revolution ramped up in both the United States and Britain. What would Dickens think to learn that nearly 2 centuries after his novella, one-third of the children in the wealthiest country in the world live in poverty?

As Scrooge said to Marley's ghost, "But you were always a good man of business, Jacob," so perhaps this is all just collateral damage of capital, unfettered markets doing there own thing, the winners and losers?  Marley responded, "Business! Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business."

Business as usual, as Springsteen suggested has left a lot of folks out in the cold, with real issues and concerns that neither party has historically addressed, only one of which, is that we permit, in this country, one in three children to live in poverty.

In A Christmas Carol, nearing the end of his time with the Spirit of Christmas Present, the Spirit opens his robe at his feet to reveal two neglected-appearing children. In answer to Scrooge's inquiry of who they belonged to, the Spirit replied:

They are Man's,...And they cling to me, appealing from their fathers. This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased.
 Ignoring Want surprised many of us this past November at the Electoral College vote tally, when the slim margin of victory for the popular vote was overruled by our republic's Electoral Collage process to grant the presidential election to Donald Trump, who knew, if nothing else, there was a void to fill.

"Most of all, beware the boy (Ignorance)..." Whether or not it will be a 'con job', as Springsteen suggests may require the perspective of his actions as a president. One thing is certain though, today as much as 175 years ago, as the Industrial Revolution was just gaining momentum, we ignore Ignorance and Want at our peril. The Spirit of Christmas Present continued, "Deny it. Slander those who tell it ye. Admit it for your factious purposes, and make it worse. And abide the end."

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Moving Forward

Guest blogger, Ron Sacco, sent the following in response to my forwarding Garrison Keilor's OpEd from the Washington Post on November 9, 2016, and Jonathan Pie's YouTube blaming Lefty elitists for the Trump win. He didn't approve of either position as an "uplifting message," and responded with the following:

I read the Keillor op-ed and listened to the video.  I was hoping for something uplifting but I suppose that would be an illusion.  I don't agree with  either point of view:  Hillary (Fucking)[Note: Pie repeatedly uses this adjective in his video]  Clinton was a horrible candidate because the anti-democratic rhetoricians have been running a counter-campaign since 'ninety-two.  Nothing stuck but she developed a negative patina that repelled people.  She WAS probably the most qualified candidate ever to run for the office.i don't  disagree that she is about as charismatic as a spreadsheet and had no crusading message of cultural renewal.  Presidents don't actually punch people out of airplanes.  She would have been a steady, competent bureaucrat.

I also disagree that we should wait for the incoming administration to crash on the rocks and expect the masses to accurately attribute causation.  Bush couldn't  find a thousand ragged men in the rocks and then attacked the WRONG country and this is Obama's fault as well as all the other conflicts that rippled from the instability.

The oligarchy has effectively hid behind the government, the
AstroTurf political movements, and the professionals who profit by attracting ears and clicks by outrageous, counterfactual ,conservative commentary.

There are people who make their living by such pursuits as analyzing residence records to enable precise gerrymandering or the best way to muddy a message. we  have to become better at controlling the message so it carries through.  We have to actively attack people who are generating lies or using information out of context to obscure meaning.  It's not enough to counter their output.we have to stop them from continuing their task.  Much of what is coming out now has no basis in reality.  You can't debate fantasy;  (See Trevor Noah's monologue on 'are goblins faster than unicorns').

There was a good social structural reason why revolutionaries killed  the clerics, servants, etc. who surrounded the autocrats and profited from the status quo.  We need to find ways to squash false news purveyors whether they are just selling advertising or manipulating information to allow themselves to profit unfairly at others expense. 

In discussions of false news sites, I hear advise about how to be more discriminating.  I am not sure how many people want to question news that agrees with what they want to believe.  Does anyone really believe that the Clinton's are running a child prostitution site out of a pizza place that isn't looking for an excuse to grab his guns and play hero?This victory was partly due to the rise of the poorly informed voter.    We ignored them and the chickens cane home to roost. 

I don't know where to go with this .  we need to form networks that share techniques that can not be turned against truth for the public good.  simple, incorrect messages are attractive, especially to people who are dreading the future.  We need to find ways to reach those who aren't trained to process information or who actively find it threatening.

As for uplifting messages, after the election I sent each of the members of my family some TED talks that I hoped would cheer them.    I believe they have had zero viewings.  I now just dig a hole and shout into it.



Thank you Ron!!


Thursday, November 24, 2016

Immigration

As the direct descendant of an immigrant, I've given a great deal of thought to the discussion of immigrants in this country, the possible danger of permitting certain types of people in, certain religions, building the wall, etc. It's perplexing...

This Thanksgiving, I am very grateful to the indigenous Americans who offered their help and friendship to my ancestor John Howland, and the other immigrants aboard the sailing ship, the Mayflower, in 1620. The Wampanoag, who lived in the Northeastern part of the United States for 12,000 years, prior to the arrival of these settlers, welcomed these immigrants with food, supplies, and agricultural training, in spite of the fact that the English were a different skin color, spoke a different language, and had a very different religion.

Perhaps our concern about immigration has to do with an unspoken recognition of how we ultimately negotiated with and treated those who provided us with food, shelter, and assistance when we were immigrants, and a fear that ultimately we too may endure a similar fate at the hands of those we helped...

This Thanksgiving, I am grateful to the people who inhabited this part of the country  for thousands of generations, the Wampanoag and Abanaki, for extending their hands and opening their homes to my immigrant ancestors. It is my hope that I can incorporate their spirit of generosity and tolerance toward immigrants, and honor it in my own daily life with others.

Friday, November 11, 2016

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Venus and Jupiter in the Dooryard

In the dooryard
at dusk, a distant
waving friend,
a lover,
kin,
a face pressed to the pane
of a frosty February
glass.
a kitchen and supper dishes
behind,
the caress of smells
like flannel...

Venus climbing the next door trellis
and Jupiter just rungs below.
some nights the moon between,
or close-by,
a neighbor, playmate,
trusted friend, or quiet lover.

Before,
Eternity dances in the dooryard,
weeks before Spring's dawn,
and the wood smoke
fills the frigid air
with rekindled
memories as close as the starlight
reflected on the snow.
 

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Say It Again

The recent debate over the payroll tax and unemployment compensation extensions made it clear that many of the professed Ayn Rand worshipers on Capitol Hill are also students of George Orwell. The Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s novel 1984 was tasked with repackaging and repeating misinformation until it became reality (by sheer repetition) for those living beneath the watchful eye of Big Brother. We have heard from the Ministry of Truth that the following are truths about the top 1% wage earners in this country:

The top 1% wage earners are paying their fair share of taxes at 38%;
The top 1% wage earners are job creators in this country;
The top 1% wage earners would create less jobs if taxed more.

The Ministry of Truth has been spinning this mantra for some time now hoping with repetition we will forget the reality from which these truths were repackaged. The reality is:

1. According to data compiled from the Congressional Budget Office, the top 1% paid an average income tax of 19% in 2007, less than wage earners making less income annually. The 38% figured used is the statutory tax rate for this income category. By the way, the statutory tax rate for this income group in 1963 was 91% more than double what it is today.
2. Most small business owners are not in the top 1% wage earner category and do not fuel job creation. The corporations paying the top 1% wage earners have in fact, been job destroyers, making significant profits by moving jobs abroad. The top job creators according to US News in the last 30 years are young start-ups like Amazon, Google and Facebook, job creators that would rather do without help from Capitol Hill and the Ministry of Truth.
3. Since the top 1% wage earners aren’t job creators, whether they are taxed at a higher rate or not will have no direct impact on whether or not more jobs are created. It is certainly worth noting however that Bill Clinton increased the statutory tax rate for the top 1% in 1993, in spite of dire warnings of job losses from supply-siders and the Ministry of Truth. The result of increasing taxes on the top 1% wage earners in 1993 was an increase in job creation! In fact, during Clinton’s 8 years with no tax cuts 22.7 million jobs were created; versus the 8 years of George W. Bush’s tax cutting, which created a mere 1.08 million. Today the top 1% is paying much less than ½ what they paid in federal income tax in the 1960’s—where are all the jobs this tax savings should be creating according to the Ayn Rand devotees?

The fact is, we stand a much better chance of creating more jobs and gaining greater fiscal responsibility by taxing this group of wage earners who has benefited most from American capitalism. The top 1% wage earners are not job creators and do not contribute their fair share per capita to the federal income tax pool. Now would be a great time to eliminate the welfare we have extended to this group since the mid-60’s and use the savings to extend unemployment compensation to the people who lost their jobs, in large part, to ensure the continued bonuses and outrageous corporate salaries extended to the top 1% wage earners.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Let's Keep Funding NPR and PBS

[Below is my response added to the petition signature to ask Congress to continue funding PBS and NPR. To sign the petition, follow this link: http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/dont_defund_npr/?rc=fb_share1 ]

No, no, no! Public radio and television is perhaps the only stations worth tuning into these days, and offering the only balanced media coverage. This sort of media coverage has always been valued as a vital part of our democracy, and has always been supported, financially by the Federal government.

If we are looking for savings to balance the budget, may this taxpayer suggest:

1. We reduce our military spending dramatically;
2. Pursue the huge cost savings in the current health care bill recently passed, or;
3. Better still, a universal health care bill;
4. Ensure that those who benefit most from our capitalism, corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share in taxes;
5. Keep Congress focused on what they claim they were voted into office to do--reduce the huge budget deficit created during the Bush tenure, create jobs, reinvigorate an economy brutalized by deregulation during the Bush presidency, and not what they appear to be doing now--wasting taxpayers dollars pursuing an agenda few taxpayers are interested in--reversing the health care legislation, reversing women's rights to choose, and defending one of the most critical tools of our democracy.

Please stop wasting our money and get to work on what the voters put you in office to do.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

On Abortion: Listen to Palin

Thia morning, after listening on NPR to the craziest GOP rationale for restricting a woman's right to choose and where funding might be coming from to make this choice, I heard the following quote from one of the GOP's spokeswoman, "Instead of a government thinking that they need to take over [and] make decisions for us according to some politician or politician's wife's priorities — just leave us alone. Get off our back" (Click here for the story).

If Palin is this upset about Michelle Obama's program to restrict children from being fed crap for school lunches, imagine how upset she'll be when she discovers that members of her own party want to restrict her right to planning her parenthood!

Monday, January 10, 2011

Winter Hint



Watching the twilight winter sky deepen
from violet to mysterious heliotrope the stars
grow brighter, nearer,
with each passing breath.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Recollections

Two pairs of shoes in the sand at the Cape photo by Steve Kelley

Her fingers furtively picked through the little heap of attic dust, scavenging for any scrap of him she'd overlooked these past twenty years.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

'ol Scrooge

The man with thick glasses, wrapped in a blanket, watches alone, Scrooge in flickering b&w. He pushes his glasses back up after dabbing his eyes.





Saturday, November 20, 2010

Another Hint Fiction


My son insisted carrying the heavy sack. Halfway to the hole
Blaize slid out, he fell on top of her. She lay breathless, he inconsolable.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Wicked Short Short Stories

Does Robert Swartwood's Hint Fiction of 25 wordes or less qualify as a short story? Here's the NPR Story that got me thinking about wicked short fiction. Photograph of Wolf Moon taken Jan '09 on Kennebunk Beach by Steve Kelley
My Hint Fiction
Martel whispered, “Man, she’s pregnant.” “You’re wrong, “ I said. Our eyes drew the other's out from the corners of the lounge. Martel was right.

 

"Dad, I stopped to get water, my car's overheating." "Son, there's a hole in the hose." "I'll fix it later, I just need some water now."

 

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Corporate Oxymorons

This corporate speak stuff always reminds me of Orwell's Double Speak and the Ministry of Peace in 1984. Perhaps in this particular case Animal Farm is the more similar!

Here's the scenario: several weeks after Hannaford grocery store bought out the independently owned community grocery store in my community, Garden Street Market, the flyer below is distributed by mail to residents of the community.


Image featuring the text No Local Farms No Local Milk

"Great! Hannaford gets it!" I think.

My first trip into the Hannaford big box, several times larger than Garden Street Market, I'm looking everywhere for the Harris Farm Milk, the local dairy, the milk I bought every week from Garden Street Market...the dairy that has cows that look just like Bessie above.

No Harris Farm milk. I ask at the register. "We don't carry that," the cashier says. "It's the local dairy," I say, "I bought it every week at the local store, Garden Street Market, the one Hannaford bought out..."

No Harris Farm Milk for you!!

Undaunted, an email is forwarded to customer service at Hannaford. A product research specialist returns my email with an apology for my inconvenience, assurances that the manager will be contacted regarding my request for milk from the local dairy, etc. etc. I have since received two customer service surveys from Hannaford asking how satisfied I was with the handling of this.

Hmmm. No Harris Farm Milk for you!

Hannaford flyer featuring the text Local Milk is a KeeperEach week, I dutifully ask the cashiers for the local dairy's milk, and each week I am told they don't carry it, and now I see the "Local Milk is a Keeper" on the reusable bag they sell at the cash registers, no doubt manufactured somewhere locally... offshore.

The independent convenience store, The Landing Store, now carries Harris Farm Milk, from the local dairy. They don't send out flyers in the mail asking for donations to support local dairies (whose products they don't sell), or sell reusable bags with pictures of New England cows, manufactured in China. They sell the local dairy's milk and put the glass bottles in a paper bag so they won't break when I stick them in the pannier on my bike for the ride home.

Keep local farms by shopping from local independent merchants that really get it.


Friday, June 4, 2010

Teach the Family to Fish

Recently, my brother Mike, totally exasperated with the prospect of oil washing ashore on the western coast of Florida, where he lives, wrote on his Facebook page "Boycott BP!!!" Seems like a no brainer doesn't it these days. I wrote back, "I'll add this to my boycott of Exxon."

As the Exxon Valdez fiasco played out from 1989 to their termination of clean-up activities in 1991, leaving hundreds of miles of coast still devastated by the 11 million gallon crude spill, even this skeptical writer could not have imagined that 20 short years later Exxon would post nearly $20 billion in annual earnings, down $5 billion from the year prior. Exxon must indeed be grateful for our collective short-term memory as American consumers.

No doubt there are many of us who will never purchase Exxon or BP products again if it can be helped, and neither company will notice. One reporter said last week that BP earns nearly $24 billion annually, and that the worst case scenario would be that BP spends 1 1/2 year's earnings on clean-up.

Last week, Carly Fiorina the ex-CEO of Hewlett Packard said of incumbent Senator Barbara Boxer (Democrat of California), who she is trying to unseat, "Barbara Boxer does not understand that families are more important than fish. Of course we all want to protect our environment, but common sense tells us there must be a balance." (The complete NPR story can be read here.)

That is why this sort of boycott really won't work, not yet anyway. Many of us saw sad compelling photos and videos of countless birds, sea otters, fish, and a myriad of other wildlife struggle and die in oil saturated water and beaches of Alaska 21 years ago. It wasn't enough to get us out of the SUV, commuting less to work, swap the bicycle for the car on close errands, buying vegetables from farms close to home instead of those shipped across country via truck... families are after all, as Ms. Fiorina stated, mor important than fish. Perhaps Senator Boxer recognizes that the balance may lie in our unchallenged family values.

Bill McKibben a scholar in residence at Middlebury College in Vermont and author of Earth: Making A Life On a Tough New Planet, explained it this way in Living on Earth, "The reason we're not getting further in Washington, the reason that we're making bad compromises with industry on these bills is because there's not enough public outrage, and not enough public action."

Perhaps, like in many parts of Louisiana, the fish are vital to the family, and just as important. There was not enough public outrage 19 years ago when Exxon abandoned a woefully incomplete clean-up job it had botched from the moment the Valdez ran aground spilling 11 million gallons of oil. There may still not be enough outrage as we watch nearly half a million gallons per day leak into the Gulf, and fall prey to the same lies told to consumers, affected residents, and legislators by corporate oil executives seeking to "get their lives back." If there was enough outrage, we might take the money saved from a couple SUV tanks of BP or Exxon gas, purchase a US-made bicycle, and pedal with the family to the local farm stand, or to shop downtown at a local store.

Oh yeah, we'd boycott BP (Amoco)and Exxon products.




Thursday, May 20, 2010

A Command Performance

In the 7 weeks since the tragedy on April 6 which killed 29 miners, Mr. Blankenship has earned nearly a 1/2 million dollars as CEO of a union-busting company that has been cited 600 times for safety violations in the past 18 months alone, and is a vocal opponent of industry regulations.

Mr. Blankenship will earn nearly $16,000 each day he is scolded by lawmakers on Capitol Hill--many of whom share his opposition to tighter regulations and industry employees represented by unions.

For Blankenship's ability to sit before lawmakers, concerned citizens, and the grieving families of the 29 non-union Massey employees, and state with a straight face that safety comes before profits at Massey, he deserves every penny, for a command performance few could replicate.

What a disgrace!

This author would welcome the identification of Massey products and companies that use them so this educated consumer may choose not to contribute to the millions of dollars Blakenship earns at the helm of a company that repeatedly flaunts safety, regulation, and lawful employee representation. As for the pots calling the kettle black, on Capitol Hill, don't waste ALL your pious indignation and finger waggling on Blankenship, BP Oil is just coming ashore.


Pension Fund managers from several states vote against 3 Massey board members re-election. http://articles.courant.com/2010-05-14/business/hc-digbizbrf0514.artmay14_1_pension-massey-stock-re-election-at-next-week

Proposal for the Boycott of Massey Energy on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Proposal-For-the-Boycott-of-Massey-Energy/115593658451644#!/pages/Proposal-For-the-Boycott-of-Massey-Energy/115593658451644?v=info&ref=mf#info_edit_sections

Friday, April 16, 2010

Stoking the Coal Fire

Did anyone else catch the end of Wednesday morning's NPR story on the tragedy at Massey's Upper Branch Mine? For those with the stomach, here it is again. NPR quoted S&P Equity as reporting that Massey Energy was again, a good buy for investors. S&P Equity wrote, "We believe that the financial impact of the Upper Big Branch mine tragedy to Massey Energy will be immaterial."

This must be comforting news to the families who lost loved ones--at least the shares of stock they own in the company that cost their loved one's their lives won't decrease in value as a result of the repeated pattern of safety violations and negligence perpetrated by Massey Energy against its employees and the communities they live in.

If the stock price of Massey Energy remains unaffected by the 29 lives lost in the largest U.S. mining disaster in decades, then it must be a safe bet that CEO Don Blankenship, will continue receiving the $19.7 million annual salary he receives at the helm of the 4th largest energy company in the U.S. Mr. Blankenship earns more PER DAY than the Massey employees who were killed earned per year.

Mr. Blankenship earns that kind of money, because he understands what it takes to keep the stock price of an energy company like Massey steady, in spite of the 29 deaths 2 weeks ago, the 16 deaths between 2000-2007, the thousands of citations levied against the Upper Branch Mine for both safety and environmental negligence, the growing concern over mountaintop mining promoted by Massey Energy, and millions of dollars in contested EPA fines. Yes, Mr. Blankenship, knows how to play this game--he is not surprisingly anti-union, anti-regulation, and routinely lines the pockets of election campaigns for officials like Brent Benjamin who would eventually help overturn a $50 million judgement against Massey Energy.

S&P Equity is absolutely right. Unless we as educated consumers, outraged citizens, and voters commit to demanding immediate change, miners who make less in one year than Mr. Blankenship makes in one day, will continue to die, so CEOs like him can take home $380,000 per week and keep the stock prices of their companies "immaterially" affected by the social devastation caused by their unmitigated greed.

It is time to demand that pension fund managers holding Massey Energy stock over the dead bodies of those 29 recently killed employees, insist on Blankenship's firing and criminal prosecution. We must demand that the EPA collect the millions of dollars owed by Massey Energy for past-due safety and environmental citations. Finally, as educated consumers and compassionate citizens we must refuse to do business with companies like Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Wendy's, and Arby's who support companies like Massey Energy that repeatedly exploit and endanger their employees while contributing to the destruction of our communities and environments.

For more information on companies to boycott or ways to get involved, visit Boycott Mountaintop Removal Supporters or http://www.ilovemountains.org/.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Secular Socialism...Boo!

At the recent Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, GOP leaders such as Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, and Liz Cheney took turns explaining why Obama was doing such a horrible job as Commander-in-Chief. Gingrich was quick to paint Obama as the new Voodoo chieftain of "the most radical administration in American history." Gingrich used the term, certain to become the new bogeyman epitaph, "secular socialist machine." Sounds pretty bad doesn't it?

This got me wondering, did any of these folks really have a clue what was being said, with the term "secular socialist," or was everyone just reacting to words supercharged in the vernacular of evangelical capitalists?

Take the word secular, heretofore tossed in front of another Voodoo word, humanist. You may remember these heathens as the people who insisted on doing good in the world based on a moral code that didn't necessarily include a God as the evangelicals understood God. Definitely radical stuff.

These secular radicals aren't as new as Gingrich et al. might have us believe. It was secular radicals like Locke and Voltaire over 200 years ago, that influenced the secular radicals that founded the United States, and wrote a secular Constitution to govern the new Republic. Mr. Gingrich may recollect from his historical study that many of the preeminent founders of this country were by no means orthodox Christians. In fact Washington, Franklin, Hancock, LaFayette, Hamilton, and others, practiced Freemasonry--a very tolerant, inclusive form of deism that many evangelical capitalists might call secular today.

The United States was, in fact, founded by thinkers who recognized the importance and value of secularism in democracy.

Really, is socialism still a nasty word? It's been kicked around recently and brandished almost as much as it was in Senator McCarthy's time--back when we were convinced that folks like Pete Seeger would bring us to our political knees!

Let's look at the top 30 countries in the Economic Freedom of the World Index. This index measures what capitalist's hold near and dear to their hearts. GOP leaders like Palin, Gingrich, and Cheney will find at least some common ground in the values of countries that promote economic freedom among their citizens. At least 22 of the top 30 countries in the Economic Freedom of the World Index have a form of Universal Health Care System. This criteria alone, according to many of the evangelical capitalists, make them socialists. This 'socialist' list includes: New Zealand; Japan; Germany; Belgium; United Kingdom; Kuwait; Sweden; Canada; United Arab Emirates; Netherlands; Finland; Luxembourg; Denmark; France; Australia; Ireland; Portugal; Cyprus; Iceland; Hong Kong; Singapore; and Switzerland. In spite of the fact that they all have universal health care, and are socialists in at least this one regard, they are also some of the strongest allies to the United States. Some might even be secular socialists.

Before you folks pack up your Obama slam-fest there in New Orleans, maybe you can explain to the citizens of that fine city how they might have fared after the hurricane with a radical administration of secular socialists in office? Booga! Booga!